Page Title: John Stewart’s Other family – hiding in plain sight | learnalittleeveryday

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description: Foreword: For genealogists researching British ancestors the UK Census records are a key primary source, especially for establishing core parent-child family relationships. In the following research I want to show how the censuses can sometimes provide insight into more extended-family relationships. Introduction: I'm sure there are many genealogists who work in a very structured way, taking one…

  • This webpage makes use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: William (11), Alice (9), Margaret J. (7), Elizabeth (4) Ada (2) 1901 dead Elizabeth (14) Ada (12) John (8) John Stewart does not appear in the 1911 census, so it is assumed he died before the census, possibly in Q1 1910 in Stockton district. There is, however, another John Stewart, aged 68, born in Ballybay, Co. Monaghan found in the 1911 census, and some family trees. Given the age discrepancy between the marriage registration and the census data, I have some concerns that I may be mixing up two John Stewarts, however there is at least more evidence connecting the two families. Alice Stewart The 1901 census shows an Alice Stewart, aged 18, born in Stockton-on-Tees as a visitor to William Stewart. There is only one Alice Stewart recorded as being born in the Stockton registration district between 1880 and 1885. This is most likely to be the Alice Stewart, daughter of John Stewart, as recorded in the 1891 census. In this case she would be visiting her uncle and family. Frederick Frazer The last census stray is Frederick Frazer, who is also a visitor at the house of William Stewart. It is possible that Frederick is the son of Annie Stewart and William McCrea Frazer. This couple are recorded as getting married in Q1 1889 in Stockton registration district. As Annie was the daughter of William Stewart he would be the grandson of William Stewart, although he is not recorded as such in the census. Final Thoughts Putting all this information together I think that both William and John Stewart are the sons of John Stewart, my gg-grandfather. There is nothing that directly contradicts this hypothesis. More importantly the links between the William and Charles and William and John Stewart support this idea. It would be helpful in this research if DNA testing would show a link between my known Stewart relatives and descendants of both William and John. Sadly I’ve yet to identify any living descendants from either of these two lines. Even though William had 8 children and John 5, there are no clear records of any great-grandchildren from either brother. In part this is because they would have been born and grown up in the period between the last publicly available census (1911) and the 1939 Register . The publication of the 1921 census (expected in 2022) may help clarify this. I have built a publicly-available family tree of the William and John Stewart families at This covers all suspected descendants of both William and John. If it is the case that both family lines petered out, there is still the possibility that other Stewarts exist from John Stewart’s first marriage. Maybe someday I will get to find and read the original Lissan parish records, that may give some clarity on the whole Stewart family. As genealogists, we can only dream of these things! Advertisements

  • This webpage has 463 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has no spelling errors that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken links:

  • This webpage has no broken links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • We were unable to detect what date this page was last modified

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are missing their width and height - GOOD WORK.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears to be mobile friendly - this is a GOOD thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has 1 links that do not contain anchor text - this is NOT a good thing.

W3C Validation:

  • This webpage has no W3C validation errors - GOOD WORK.

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!