Page Title: Submit a Review – Reads 4 Tweens

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is NOT GOOD for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: Submit a Review These guidelines are for adult reviewers. You’ll find guidelines specific to kid reviewers here . Reviews for Reads 4 Tweens serve a specific purpose, which is to help parents and educators make informed choices about books for their kids. If you’ve read a lot of the reviews on the site, you probably have a good idea of what we’re looking for. But here it’s broken down, which lets me spell out some of my own assumptions. The primary question to keep in mind is “What content and themes do you think adults might want to know about?” Often those are warnings (graphic violence, bad examples that seem acceptable in the book, implied adult themes, conscious or unconscious -isms like racism, sexism, colonialism, what have you) but they may also be things that are handled well—lessons well taught, main characters who make good choices, avoidance of the expected stereotypes, etc. Gut reactions based on your own experiences, your own kids, and other parents and kids you know are totally valid. This is a lot to keep track of! Especially if you’re providing specific examples, which I hope you will (remember that spoilers are encouraged , as often those are exactly the kinds of things adults wish they knew about). Personally, I keep a notebook nearby while I read so I can jot down notes as I come across things I’ll want to remember later. Some Definitions Age recommendations are based primarily on content and themes and are necessarily guesses. Typically, twelve year olds can analyze ambiguous morality and tough choices better than eight year olds can. Older readers are less likely to be affected by some graphic violence and may even appreciate some romance. The review provides the reasoning so other adults can make informed choices based on the individual child. Books for precocious readers are books that have a reading complexity that’s higher than the maturity of the content. For instance, a 200 page book with complex sentences that isn’t terribly violent and doesn’t contain betrayals and emotional abuse might be a good candidate for precocious readers. Books for reluctant readers might have a visual component that adds to comprehension and breaks up intimidating blocks of text. They might be fast paced and plot driven, preventing interest from lagging. They might be on the short side but have content that isn’t too childish and will appeal to older readers. A surprising number of books are simultaneously good for precocious and reluctant readers. Good read alouds may have content that will appeal to younger kids but a complexity that might frustrate them without help. Read alouds might have topics that adults might want to discuss with kids. And some books are just written in a way that begs for voices and sound effects! Writing a Review There’s no strict format of what categories get included; that all depends on the book. So basically, quick overview of the story, header of “Things you might want to know before suggesting this to your kid,” and then spoilers galore of things that parents and educators might want to know—both positive and potentially problematic—when a kid reads the book. It ends with a recommendation that should include things like age range, whether it might appeal to reluctant readers, whether content is appropriate for precocious readers, if it’s especially well suited to read aloud, etc. Some things you might want to include in your overview Brief overview—a sentence or two about overall plot, whether it’s funny, sad, emotional, etc. General opinion of the book—objective, personal, and for kids you know Discussion of things handled well or poorly Discussion of things that might be issues Didacticism (are concepts presented as discussable or presented as unquestionable truth?) Well written or not (word usage, tone, etc.) Story structure (well paced? Plodding? Ridiculous?) Things you might want to know before suggesting this to your kid Use any of these that are appropriate, each pulled out as section with a header. However, these are only guidelines—skip anything that doesn’t apply to your book and create categories for anything you want to mention that doesn’t fit what’s here. Themes that are mature or controversial Sex Stereotypes (shattered, typical, not really present?) Violence/abuse/neglect

  • This webpage has 677 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has 1 words which may be misspelt.

Possibly mis-spelt word: Tweens

Suggestion: Weens
Suggestion: T weens
Suggestion: Twins
Suggestion: Tween
Suggestion: Teens
Suggestion: Tweets
Suggestion: Tweeds
Suggestion: Tween s
Suggestion: Sweetens

Broken links:

  • This webpage has 44 broken links.

Broken link URL:

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has 44 broken image links.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • We were unable to detect what date this page was last modified

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has 5 images that do not have their width and height specified.

Mobile friendly:

  • >After testing this webpage we were unable to determine if this page is mobile friendly.

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

  • This webpage has no W3C validation errors - GOOD WORK.

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!