Page Title: FuturePundit: The Robots Are Coming And Cutting Employment

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is NOT GOOD for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: March 31, 2017 The Robots Are Coming And Cutting Employment Daron Acemoglu of MIT and Pascual Restrepo of Boston University find that robots really do decrease human employment. As robots and other computer-assisted technologies take over tasks previously performed by labor, there is increasing concern about the future of jobs and wages. We analyze the effect of the increase in industrial robot usage between 1990 and 2007 on US local labor markets. Using a model in which robots compete against human labor in the production of different tasks, we show that robots may reduce employment and wages, and that the local labor market effects of robots can be estimated by regressing the change in employment and wages on the exposure to robots in each local labor market¬ódefined from the national penetration of robots into each industry and the local distribution of employment across industries. Using this approach, we estimate large and robust negative effects of robots on employment and wages across commuting zones. We bolster this evidence by showing that the commuting zones most exposed to robots in the post-1990 era do not exhibit any differential trends before 1990. The impact of robots is distinct from the impact of imports from China and Mexico, the decline of routine jobs, offshoring, other types of IT capital, and the total capital stock (in fact, exposure to robots is only weakly correlated with these other variables). According to our estimates, one more robot per thousand workers reduces the employment to population ratio by about 0.18-0.34 percentage points and wages by 0.25-0.5 percent. Factory robots can replace multiple workers. But the replacement ratio will depend heavily on the job. An autonomous vehicle system could in theory replace multiple workers even though there is one autonomous vehicle system per car or truck the vehicle would operate 24x7. No surprise that blue collar routine manual work is hardest hit. We also document that the employment effects of robots are most pronounced in manufacturing, and in particular, in industries most exposed to robots; in routine manual, blue collar, assembly and related occupations; and for workers with less than college education. Interestingly, and perhaps surprisingly, we do not find positive and offsetting employment gains in any occupation or education groups. The number of industries exposed to robots will rise sharply in the coming years. Restaurants will become ripe for robotic takeover as robotic cooks become competitive in restaurants and order-taking becomes increasingly done via tablets and cell phones. Autonomous vehicle control will mature to enable replacement of humans in taxis and long haul trucks. I expect restaurants and transportation will both extensively automate in the 2020s. Ditto stores and warehouse. Construction is messy and much more difficult to automate than manufacturing. But the robots are coming to construction too and already there is an ancient construction occupation threatened by robots: bricklaying. The Construction Robotics Sam100 robot can lay bricks 6 times faster than a human . Researchers at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology claim their In-Situ Fabricator can lay bricks 20 times faster than humans . On the bright side, cheaper construction will lower housing costs, at least where no NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) regulations block construction. So anyone who can manage to stay competitive in the labor market will be able to buy bigger houses.

  • This webpage has 542 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are NOT using header tags - this is a NOT a good thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has 4 words which may be misspelt.

Possibly mis-spelt word: Daron

Suggestion: Drano
Suggestion: Darin
Suggestion: Dacron
Suggestion: Darvon
Suggestion: Daren
Suggestion: Damon
Suggestion: Baron
Suggestion: Aaron
Suggestion: Radon
Suggestion: Darn
Suggestion: Ronda
Suggestion: Aron
Suggestion: Arron

Possibly mis-spelt word: Acemoglu

Suggestion: Guacamole

Possibly mis-spelt word: Pascual

Suggestion: Pascal
Suggestion: Paschal
Suggestion: PASCAL

Possibly mis-spelt word: Restrepo

Suggestion: Strep

Broken links:

  • This webpage has no broken links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • It appears that this page was updated on the Wednesday, September 13, 2017 which is NOT within the last thirty days - this is NOT a good thing!

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are missing their width and height - GOOD WORK.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears NOT to be mobile friendly - this is NOT a good thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!